“Wireless” Polysomnography?!
November 24th, 2009 by Jerusha Michael
Hook-up of electrodes for a wireless polysomnography on the Sapphire PSG sleep diagnostic system
Wires. This struck me as odd (very odd), because my friend was undergoing a wireless polysomnography (sleep test used in sleep disorder diagnosis). To be fair, I already knew that a wireless polysomnography did not mean a polysomnography without wires/electrodes on the patient, nevertheless, I could not help but react at how the term "wireless polysomnography" did not match what I was seeing!
In this article, I want to briefly discuss:
Polysomnography:
The patient is hooked-up with sensors to monitor body functions like heart rhythm, brain, eye, and muscle movement, etc during sleep. The sensors plug into a patient-unit also called the jackbox. The jackbox connects to an amplifier, which then connects to the wiring system. The entire sleep lab is hard-wired so that the PSG data travels through the cables from the patient room into the control room, where a sleep technician can monitor the PSG data on a computer.
Wireless Polysomnography:
The patient is hooked-up with the standard sensors. The sensors plug into a patient-unit (which integrates the jack-box and amplifiers). The patient-unit wirelessly transmits data to a receiver in the control room where the sleep technician can monitor the PSG data on a computer. But why is this a big deal?
Benefits of wireless PSG
While wireless polysomnography is not flawless, it offers distinct advantages:
During a typical polysomnography, the patient will need assistance from the technician to unplug the jackbox from the amplifier every time he/she needs to use the restroom or get a drink of water during the night. A wireless polysomnography allows for easy mobility since the patient-unit is not tethered to the wiring cables of the control room.
Wireless PSG completely eliminates the cost of running cables throughout the facility with its ability to transmit data through multiple walls. Also, there are typically fewer components with wireless devices and lower risk of individual component failure.
With wireless polysomnography, the entire PSG system can be packed into a brief-case of sorts. Setups outside of the lab become more feasible. For example, mobile diagnostic studies in hotels (which is more cost-effective than a sleep lab set-up), hospitals, nursing homes, or patient homes mean that a comprehensive sleep diagnostic service can come to the patient instead of the patient coming to the lab for a PSG. This cuts transportation costs which can be significant for patients who cannot travel unassisted.
Overcrowded sleep labs will only have to deal with more complex patients who require in-lab testing, while other patients can be tested off-site. Each patient population can then receive a faster diagnosis and therefore faster treatment initiation, cutting out the need for long waits or investing in additional beds for the sleep lab.
Tags: polysomnography, Sapphire PSG, sleep lab, wireless polysomnography, wirless psg
November 24th, 2009 at 5:45 pm
Nice writing. You are on my RSS reader now so I can read more from you down the road.
Allen Taylor
November 24th, 2009 at 6:02 pm
I found the article interesting and it it gives a nice,simple definition of your wireless products
November 25th, 2009 at 10:00 am
Allen & A P,
Thanks for your time and comments!
If any questions come up feel free to post them here, and I will do my best to answer them.
November 25th, 2009 at 10:20 am
This helps “clarify” the issue of wireless……..well defined. Thanks.
November 25th, 2009 at 10:46 am
Nice write up. What you didn’t discuss, but may be a topic of its own, is the pros/cons of ‘taking the PSG to the patient’. Although you did mention travel costs, probably more significant is the 1st night effect in which often patients are not comfortable and may not sleep well at the sleep lab the 1st night, but if you take the system to them they are in their own environment. In their own environment, however, it is harder to control the environment (noise, light, etc..) but then again, might those be things that should be considered when evaluating their sleep?
Again, nice job.
December 1st, 2009 at 8:37 am
Matt, first, thanks for taking the time to comment. You make a very good point. I think wearing wires/stuff while trying to sleep will contribute to some of the first night effect no matter what, and being home or somewhere familiar could help ease things.
Also, it’s an interesting thought that we can get a certain (maybe different) perspective on a person’s sleep by testing in their home or regular sleeping space.
Lastly, we want to be objective about wireless, and I did link to another article on how wireless psg with all it’s advantages is not flawless: http://blog.clevemed.com/2008/wireless-polysomnography-does-%E2%80%98wireless%E2%80%99-add-considerable-benefit/
(u may need to scroll a tiny bit)
Thanks again!
March 15th, 2010 at 9:34 pm
[...] CleveMed Blogs » Blog Archive » “Wireless” Polysomnography?! [...]