Posts Tagged ‘Parkinson’s Research’

Benefits of Exercise for Parkinson’s Disease

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by cardinal motor symptoms of tremor, slowness of movement, and rigidity [1]. Symptoms directly affect quality of life and activities of daily living by impeding coordination of multiple limbs and fine dexterity. This can be extremely debilitating, leading to decreased mobility and independence with increased risk for falling.

Current clinical PD therapies are designed to address disease motor symptoms; however, there are limitations associated with these approaches. Drug therapy (e.g., levadopa) effectiveness may decrease over time and lead to side effects such as dyskinesias (involuntary irregular movements) [2]. Patients may eventually consider surgical procedures such as deep brain stimulation when increased drug dose side effects outweigh the benefits. This procedure, however, has limitations and risks, such as improper lead placement, decreased effectiveness over time, and not being appropriate for all patients [3].

While treatments such as drug therapy and surgical procedures are clinical standards, new research suggests exercise as a potentially less invasive alternative/adjunct treatment. It has been well established that exercise reduces risks of developing chronic diseases such as cancer, obesity, and heart disease [4-6]. Such benefits of exercise can also be translated to motor improvement in PD [7, 8]. The general concept behind the benefit of exercise in PD suggests that physical exercise may stimulate specific biochemical changes to induce production of dopamine, a neurotransmitter involved in allowing the body to perform smooth controlled movements [9]. The sedentary lifestyle associated with PD promotes further motor symptom impairment through muscle weakness, postural imbalance, and increased risk of falling [10]. Thus, there exists an urgency to develop PD-specific exercise regimens early in disease progression in an attempt to break or delay this debilitating cycle.

1. Pflanzer, R.G., et al., Human Physiology. 1996, Saunders College: Forth Worth.
2. Encarnacion, E.V., et al., Levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson’s disease: etiology, impact on quality of life, and treatments. Eur Neurol, 2008. 60(2): p. 57-66.
3. Beric, A., et al., Complications of deep brain stimulation surgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 2001. 77(1-4): p. 73-8.
4. Dugan, S.A., Exercise for preventing childhood obesity. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, 2008. 19(2): p. 205-16, vii.
5. Kelley, G.A., et al., Efficacy of aerobic exercise on coronary heart disease risk factors. Prev Cardiol, 2008. 11(2): p. 71-5.
6. Knobf, M.T., et al., Exercise and quality of life outcomes in patients with cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs, 2007. 23(4): p. 285-96.
7. Ridgel, A.L., et al., Forced, not voluntary, exercise improves motor function in Parkinson’s disease patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2009. 23(6): p. 600-8.
8. Crizzle, A.M., et al., Is physical exercise beneficial for persons with Parkinson’s disease? Clin J Sport Med, 2006. 16(5): p. 422-5.
9. Tillerson, J.L., et al., Exercise induces behavioral recovery and attenuates neurochemical deficits in rodent models of Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience, 2003. 119(3): p. 899-911.
10. Ashburn, A., et al., A randomised controlled trial of a home based exercise programme to reduce the risk of falling among people with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2007. 78(7): p. 678-84.

Need for Home Monitoring of Parkinson’s Disease Motor Symptoms

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

One of the most difficult aspects of monitoring Parkinson’s disease (PD) motor symptoms, is that the severity of tremor and bradykinesia (slowed movements) greatly fluctuates throughout the day.

When medication is at its peak effectiveness, the patient is said to be “On.” Similarly, when medication has completely worn off, the subject is said to be “Off.” Symptoms are often worst first thing in morning, but improve after the first dose of medication. However, as the medication wears off, symptoms return mid-day. These cycles of waxing and waning motor symptoms continue throughout the day. Controlling these “On” and “Off” cycles can be difficult, as patients with PD are typically evaluated in the neurologists’ office, which only allows the physician to capture a snapshot of motor symptoms. Furthermore, patients typically are instructed to refrain from taking medication the night prior to the office visit. A state of anxiety in this condition may amplify PD symptoms during motor evaluation. Monitoring motor symptoms at home would provide clinicians with improved tracking of these complex motor fluctuations and in-turn optimize medication dose to improve patient quality of life.

Kinesia is a compact wireless system developed by CleveMed to quantify movement disorder symptoms. In clinical trials, Kinesia objectively quantified tremor and bradykinesia in PD patients in the clinic. Objective symptom ratings output by the Kinesia system were highly correlated to clinician ratings. CleveMed has recently begun a clinical study in which the Kinesia system is being used throughout the day, at home, by patients with PD. Preliminary results demonstrate that Kinesia can capture the “On” and “Off” motor symptom fluctuations in a subject’s home. Monitoring PD symptoms on a more continuous basis at a patient’s home should improve clinical outcomes and decrease costs especially for disparate patient populations in areas not in close proximity to movement disorder specialists.

Gait and Balance Assessment and Therapy in Parkinson’s Disease

Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009

Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system and is primarily characterized by cardinal motor symptoms such as tremor, bradykinesia (slowness of movement), and rigidity. Lower extremity symptoms such as gait and balance disturbances (initiating movement, freezing of movement, improper movement form), especially in advanced patients, can be very debilitating, leading to decreased mobility and independence, decreased quality of life, and an increased falling/hip fracture risk [1]. A positive PD diagnosis occurs when a minimum of two cardinal symptoms present themselves. However, less attention is given to gait and balance abnormality as it typically develops in the advanced stages of PD.

Standard clinical assessment of gait and balance based on a 0 (no severity) – 4 (high severity) scale is performed using a subset of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor section. Tasks typically consist of foot stomping while seated, gait assessment while walking, arising from chair with arms crossed over the chest, and balance assessment while being pulled backwards. As gait is particularly sensitive to ON-OFF therapy state changes in PD and incorporates upper extremity function such as arm swing as well as rigidity and bradykinesia in lower extremities, gait analysis may be a reliable method of assessing overall motor function over time in PD [2].

When diagnosed with PD, the first line of treatment typically consists of L-Dopa medication to alleviate motor symptoms. However over time, drug effectiveness decreases, requiring the patient to increase dosage. Frequent and stronger side effects such as dyskinesias (uncontrolled arm movement) and unpredictable “on”/”off” episodes are cause for more invasive therapeutic intervention. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been widely recognized as an appropriate treatment option when medication no longer adequately alleviates motor symptom severity. Several therapy targets have been established for PD. Subthalamic nucleus (STN) and Globus Pallidus Interna (GPi) stimulation are recognized treatments for sustained improvement in tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia [3, 4]. However the effects on gait disturbance are less understood. During DBS lead placement and post-evaluation, neurologists adjust several settings: electrode contact configuration and stimulation parameters (frequency, pulse width, and amplitude). Studies show that while high-frequency/high voltage stimulation improves cardinal symptoms, patients exhibit increased frequency of freezing episodes. However, stimulation at lower frequencies has demonstrated improved gait [5].

New PD gait therapies are being researched and developed and existing interventions further established. Another DBS target, the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN), located near the brain stem plays an important role in locomotion function in animal models, specifically initiation and modulation of gait [6-8]. Patients with advanced stages of PD only exhibit mild improvement of freezing with standard medication such as L-Dopa [9, 10]. Preliminary studies of PPN surgeries off-medication marked a significant improvement of the UPDRS motor exam section III, specifically gait and postural qualities. In addition, the combination of STN and PPN DBS resulted in a further significant improvement. Despite promising results, PPN surgical intervention is currently in its infancy as little is known about the nucleus’ function in humans and how well animal model testing translates to human clinical trials [7].

1. Cattaneo, D., et al., Risks of falls in subjects with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2002. 83(6): p. 864-7.
2. Salarian, A., et al., Gait assessment in Parkinson’s disease: toward an ambulatory system for long-term monitoring. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2004. 51(8): p. 1434-43.
3. Hamani, C., et al., Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review of the clinical literature. Neurosurgery, 2005. 56(6): p. 1313-21; discussion 1321-4.
4. Krack, P., et al., Five-year follow-up of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med, 2003. 349(20): p. 1925-34.
5. Moreau, C., et al., STN-DBS frequency effects on freezing of gait in advanced Parkinson disease. Neurology, 2008. 71(2): p. 80-4.
6. Garcia-Rill, E., et al., Locomotion-inducing sites in the vicinity of the pedunculopontine nucleus. Brain Res Bull, 1987. 18(6): p. 731-8.
7. Pahapill, P.A., et al., The pedunculopontine nucleus and Parkinson’s disease. Brain, 2000. 123 ( Pt 9): p. 1767-83.
8. Skinner, R.D., et al., Locomotor projections from the pedunculopontine nucleus to the spinal cord. Neuroreport, 1990. 1(3-4): p. 183-6.
9. Pullman, S.L., et al., Dopaminergic effects on simple and choice reaction time performance in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology, 1988. 38(2): p. 249-54.
10. Starkstein, S.E., et al., Evoked potentials, reaction time and cognitive performance in on and off phases of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1989. 52(3): p. 338-40.

Differentiating Tremor Characteristics

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

While most people know what tremor is when they see it, they may not realize that many different types of tremor exist and why it is important to recognize them. The current gold standard of visual assessment may be blind to subtle characteristics unique to different tremor types. Tremor is a common motor symptom associated with a number of neurological disorders. Defined as rhythmic, involuntary, to-and-fro movements of a body part, tremor is most common in the hands, but can occur in the arms, legs and head. Tremor can be an especially debilitating movement disorder symptom and make activities of daily living, such as dressing, eating and writing, difficult or sometimes impossible without the help of a family member of caretaker.

Several movement disorders produce tremor as a motor symptom. The two most common are essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). ET is a common disorder characterized by uncontrolled trembling of the hands and often involuntary nodding of the head. It is the most prevalent movement disorder, affecting nearly 10 million people in the United States alone. PD is a progressive disease associated with the destruction of brain cells that produce dopamine and characterized by muscular tremor, slowing of movement, partial facial paralysis and peculiarity of gait and posture. There are currently about 1 million people in the United States living with PD.

In addition to different disorders producing tremor, different tremor types may exist within a particular disorder, each with unique physical characteristics. Two of these important characteristics are amplitude and frequency. Amplitude refers to how big the movement is while frequency refers to the speed or rate at which the oscillation is happening. Rest tremor is one type that occurs when the affected limb is completely at rest. Resting tremors occur at a specific frequency, usually 4 – 7 Hz, and are most commonly associated with PD, but in some cases found in other movement disorders. Postural tremor occurs when a specific body part is held motionless against gravity, such as extending the arms out, pointing with the hands or sitting upright without back support. Postural tremor typically occurs at a frequency of 9 – 11 Hz and can be associated with PD or ET. Other types of tremor include kinetic tremor, which occurs during a voluntary movement such as writing, drinking or eating and intention tremor, which is unique in that is occurs during a visually guided movement toward a target destination.

Distinguishing tremor types and quantitative features is very important for research, clinical judgments and intervention efficacy. CleveMed has developed a device called Kinesia™ that can be used to detect and monitor subtle differences in tremor characteristics. Kinesia is a small wireless device worn on the patient’s finger and wrist to monitor three dimensional motion. Currently being evaluated in several clinical studies around the United States, this device is intended to help standardize tremor evaluations and provide clinicians with a tool to better quantify tremor features when the signs are too subtle for clinical differentiation alone. Improving and standardizing the clinical evaluation of tremor may ultimately improve the understanding of tremor subtypes, increase efficacy of interventions and maximize patient quality of life.